This is a post to the gold blogging community
Sometimes we don't agree on what is the best way to run our blogs; Some prefer to invovle real life gold; others prefer their gold in pixel form.
I don't always agree with methods; use of material; or a myriad of other things. I have also had my (sometimes strong) disagreements with various personalities.
However, I keep to the objective facts; Where I don't like something; I provide the facts as if I was trying to convince a panel of adjudicators. Some emotionadds colour. Stating "I don't think x works because of some reason" is valuable and useful.
Again with defenses, stating that you believe that something is permissable/useful/novel because of some reason is also valuable and useful.
However name calling makes you look bad. Calling someone a crook or a scammer is a good way to take yourself off readers lists.
Do your readership a favour; If you feel very pasionately about throwing mud; that is the time to be very careful that you need to tone down the rhetoric and stick to the facts.
Proofs - [image: Next, let's assume the decision of whether to take the Axiom of Choice is made by a deterministic process ...]
2 hours ago